cargo channel header

    Click below for blogs about:

  

  


  Join Us Online


     



Devin's Monthly Book Review


China Inside Out by Bill DodsonChina Inside Out
by Bill Dodson
This book deals with 10 trends shaping China and how it affects all of us.
Full Review
1 Star1 Star1 Star1 Star1 Star1/2 Star0 Stars
  5 1/2 out of 7 Stars

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Don't have time to read?

describe the image



 

describe the image

 

 

FellowShipping Authors:

describe the image
Devin Burke, Universal Cargo CEO
With over 25 years experience in the shipping industry, Devin offers up his wisdom on the keyboard and in front of the camera. More...

describe the image
Brian Chan, The Green Logistician
Since 2003, Brian has been a logistician at UCM and promotes green practices in the shipping industry on his Green Logistician blog. More...

describe the image
Dave Stover, Account Executive
Uber-opinionated, Dave's topics have economic and socio-political themes. More...

describe the image
Jared Vineyard, UCM Content Creator
Researches and posts shipping related articles and creator of What the Freight?!?. More...

Other Blogs:

describe the image

describe the image

Join Our Online Community

Browse by Tag



Blog Directory

International Business Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Pressure on Container Rates in Freight Rate Roller Coaster

  
  
  
  
  
  

  Ucmfiles2 users Jared Newsletter Newsletter Pictures roller coaster2011 has brought some relieving news for businesses that import and export goods. Perhaps you have noticed it in your books. Container rates are on a downward trend as increase in container carriers and capacity has been surpassing demand. Carriers have been increasing container capacity, as many of their ship orders placed from years ago are now being placed into service, while container transportation has not reached its expected growth. For the moment, this means potential for competitive prices for shippers and continued supply/demand pressure which will dampen the hopes for significant pricing hikes by carriers.  

Before you get too excited that shipping freight rates will finally settle and be steady, consider the following lingering issues. There are many factors that contribute to the volatile freight rates of the sea shipping industry; however, none more so than the basics of supply and demand.  Demand onU.S.imports is expected to pick up during the traditional peak season of June to November; however, this year things have gotten to a slower start. Most carriers postponed their peak season to the end of July or early August, 2011. This is no doubt partly because of less than expected volume during this season and the carrier overcapacity caused by increased vessel space. Ocean capacity is increasing by 8.8% in 2011 while there is only about 4.4% trade growth.

Massive ships, with significantly greater capacity have already hit and are hitting the seas during the next several years. Routes between Asia and Europe have increased capacity by 15% while demand is only predicted to grow by 7.5% there. Despite all this, the carriers can still manipulate their capacity by sidelining ships to control supply and drive prices up.  This they haven’t done so far in 2011 as they did in 2010.  But if they get together to pull this off again it could wreck havoc on freight rates once again.  Will the carrier losses prompt them to tighten capacity once more later during the year ?  That is what will remain to be seen.

Air carriers have already begun removing capacity to boost rates and maintain their freight profit. Sea carriers have been known to do the same. In 2009, when the supply of carrier ships far outweighed the demand of shipped goods, hundreds of sea carriers were docked. This strategy of removing capacity reduced costs and pushed ocean rates back up, turning things back in the favor of the ocean carriers very quickly.  This is a strategy they used last year which helped the ocean carriers have one of their most profitable years. Although this is less likely in 2011 due to the significant increase in capacity, its potential is there and could cause significant price hikes if implemented. Of course, any industry’s market is more complicated than supply and demand. Fuel prices have also increased this year and the fuel bunker’s continued uncertainty and volatility will keep the freight rate roller coaster an unpredictable and nauseating ride for shippers.

So before getting too excited about the unusual calm in freight rates, be ready for more swings up and down. At least 2011 is more likely to give a less volatile ride than 2010.

To get a rate quote, click here.

For more on capacity overtaking demand, click here.

Comments

Some of your facts are slightly off; "Massive 18000 teu ships are hitting the seas", none will for a couple of years. 
 
The increased capacity in 2011 vs 2010 is a combination if far fewer vessels being anchored (in early 2010 over 550 were anchored, in 2011 the most anchored were 170) and the new vessels being delivered, many in the 10,000 teu plus catagory. 
 
Global trade is up by more than the 4.4% reported, nearer to 7% with individual trades being more or less than that. But capacity is up higher than that causing the supply/demand ratio to be favoring the buyers.  
 
You point out one very important issue - the carriers themselves being able to manage capacity as they did in 2010 and raising rates, as they did. That they didn't do the same in 2011 can be attributed to one of their own, MSC, who in 2010 did not reduce capacity as the rest of the industry did, they actually increased capacity over the year and captured volme and marketshare as they did; while at the same time going along with all of the rate increases in 2010. A very smart move for MSC, but it got the rest of the industry to react by not pulling out capacity in 2011 - and first quarter financial results reflect the return to losses except for Maersk.  
 
The question is, will the industry consider returning to managed capacity reductions? if they do, rates will rise, if they don't then the existing non-compensatory rate levels will continue and likely that some carriers will go away one way or another.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:33 PM by Gary Ferrulli
Gary 
 
 
 
good points, and more stats to consider. Although i have heard there are some of these new vessels being deployed this year. Do you happen to know when the first will come out ? Also, i am hearing bookings are starting to pick up to certain areas, and by Aug there will be some significant volume increase. However it remains to be seen if it will truly impact the proposed rate increases. I personally think they will be only to the all water East Coast vessels sometime in August. The west coast market is still very soft. 
 
But that is a good question if it will ever get back to the point of managed capacity reductions...i suppose this is the "ace in the hole" for them , but as you correctly stated, many do not want to miss out on market capitalization tactics that MSC successfully implemented. However if the job market keeps getting worse, people will eventually stop going to the stores, and that will have a ripple effect most likely taking place this by years end or into '12.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:54 PM by devin
Devin 
 
The first of the Triple E ships hits the water in 2013, a total of ten being delivered between 2013 and 2015. The next ten are due to be delivered between 2014 and 2015. So 20 of the between 2013 and 2015. 
 
Bookings in the Trans Pacific are soft; eastbound the New World Alliance pulled out a string of ships as did CSAV. 
 
The Retailers say there will be summer doldrums but picking up nicely in September-November time frame, double digit increases forecasted. 
 
Your point on US East coast well taken, but so far no one is applying the peak season surcharge. 
 
The unemployment numbers are appalling as you noted but the retailers say things are looking up; they could just be optimistic.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 3:45 PM by Gary Ferrulli
So the new vessels coming out this year are only about 12-13,000 teus ? 
 
I have been attending alot of trade shows and am hearing the usual complaints, but on the average more often than not that business is picking up for alot of importers. This means actual orders, actual shipments in the pipeline. It is proving to be a very interesting year all around...alot of trepidation, but stability as well. 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 4:57 PM by devin
"Only"? actually 10,000 to 14,000 
 
I think all carriers expect to lose substantially this year - not as bad as 2009, but not good and first quarter reports seem to indicate it. Even Maersk, who made over $400. Million in the first quarter says they will lose money in 2011.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:57 PM by Gary Ferrulli
Great points Gary, 
 
 
 
The MSC factor seems to have been crtiical.. usually Maersk is the one that sets the tone but MSC is acting like the big BOYS trying to set the tone and all carriers pay close attention to them.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:09 PM by Kamy
I guess Maersk sees what we dont see. Maybe they are going by projections from the big retailers. 
 
 
 
On another note, Gary, I see that you are a Vietnam vet. You have seen alot. My hat's off to you. Have you been in HCM since ? What has the experience been like ? 
 
 
 
Posted @ Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:56 AM by devin
I think we see what they see; a financially shaky industry and the ability (capital/cash) to build ships that are 20% more efficient than their 15,000 teu ships that are 28% more efficient than a 10,000 teu ship. They can withstand a lot lower rate levels for a longer period of time and when the markets turn, they get rich quick with others still struggling. Consolidation is coming and these ships are part of the equation.  
 
On my Vietnam experiences, I was actually stationed in Thailand at Korat RTAFB and flew 107 missions into Vietnam. Only back twice on business trips since, not good memories except the camraderie - went over with 18 other pilots; 9 came back when I did, 2 others in POW status rest were KIA. Certainly not the same place I recall back in 1966-67.
Posted @ Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:20 PM by Gary Ferrulli
Gary 
 
 
 
Interesting way to look at it. The Carriers with the Cajones are reinvesting back into the shaky economy by investing in themselves and ensuring more cost effecient ways to run their business. This is what is needed all around, in order to jump start this sluggish economy. American business has been far too wasteful in the past, and needs to learn from China I think in this regard, or even Europe in terms of Green technology. 
 
 
 
Wow what an experience to have lived through that war and have friends not make it. I have been there maybe 4 times and was shocked at how modern things are, and how friendly they were towards Americans. 
 
On another note, i see you love Golf. My son is currently holding a Canadian Pro card and is playing in the Canadian Tour right now. Not doing that great however, but he has all summer, we will see, then hopefully can be ready for U.S. Q-School in Oct. All i know is i have been playing for 40 some years, and he was better than me when he was 16. Shamefull. 
 
Posted @ Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:55 PM by devin
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics