4 Ocean Carrier International Shipping News Stories

 In business, carriers, China, container shipping, Container Shipping & Transport, Freight Forwarder, freight forwarders, Global Business, international business, International Shipping, International Shipping Company, international shipping news, Maersk, ocean freight, ocean shipping, ocean shipping lines, shipping companies, shipping news

cargo ship in water overlooking sunsetThere are a number of stories about ocean freight carriers making headlines right now. So let’s round them up and put them all in one blog.

Here are four shipping line news stories spanning big names like Maersk, Cosco, and ONE and hitting big topics like profits, services, and possible deception:

1. Maersk Adding Online Customs Clearance Service

In a recent blog post about why BCOs are choosing to ship through NVOCCs and freight forwarders instead of directly with ocean carriers, one of the six reasons I brought up was how carriers have removed services while NVOCCs and freight forwarders have added services for shippers.

Well, Maersk is bucking that trend by adding an online customs clearance service for its customers. This service isn’t available to U.S. shippers yet; however, it is expected to be by the end of the year.

Alex Lennane reports in the Loadstar:

Maersk has taken another step towards becoming an integrated company by offering digital customs clearance for ocean customers.

Its new online shipping management platform is available in seven European countries and will be rolled out worldwide by the end of the year.

It gives customers full compliance with local customs rules online, with pricing displayed for all import and export declarations. 

The product has so far been launched in Germany, France, Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland, the UK and Spain. 


Maersk tends to be a trend setter with carriers. It will be interesting to see if others try to follow suit by offering similar customs clearance services for their cargo shipments. Of course, Maersk has been making acquisitions like that of New Jersey-based customs broker Vendegrift to be able to add services like this, so the leading carrier has yet another head start.

2. Cosco’s Profits Up in 2019 Q1 But May Mean Nothing

Cosco is the first carrier to report its first quarter financial results for 2019, and the numbers they report are positive.

Mike Wackett reports in the Loadstar:

Cosco Shipping Holdings has posted a net profit of Rmb687m ($102m) for the first three months of the year.

This follows the Chinese state-owned container liner and terminal group’s $251m positive return last year, which, said Alphaliner, included $230m of subsidies from the Chinese government. 

Chinese government subsidies certainly make the profits of the state-owned carrier look better. That’s 91.6% of Cosco’s positive return for 2018 coming from Chinese subsidies!

While most look at Cosco reporting increased net profit a positive sign for ocean carriers in general, it’s hard to compare Cosco’s numbers to those of its competitors.

Alessandro Pasetti wrote a Loadstar Premium article about Cosco’s solid Q1 financial numbers meaning “nothing — or very close to nothing.”

Pasetti’s article highlights how Cosco’s operating performance cannot be properly gauged with no comparable international accounting standards, how it appears that Cosco’s acquisition of OOCL shows up on the P&L but not on the balance sheet, and how some of Cosco’s liabilities are “mildly disturbing.”

So, yes, Cosco is presenting positive financials for the first quarter with its acquisition of OOCL, but those numbers may not be as good as they appear.

And that first quarter should have been boosted some as a prolonged peak season spilled extra cargo movement into the first quarter of the year while shippers were still trying to beat tariff increases in the US-China trade war.

3. FMC Adds OOCL to Controlled Carrier List

Speaking of Cosco’s acquisition of OOCL, that acquisition is causing OOCL to be added to the Federal Register’s list of controlled carriers.

Chris Gillis reports in American Shipper:

The U.S. Federal Maritime Commission has added Orient Overseas Container Line Limited (OOCL) and OOCL (Europe) Ltd. to its list of controlled carriers due to their recent acquisition by COSCO Shipping Holdings Co. Ltd.

The FMC defines a controlled carrier as an ocean common carrier that is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by a foreign government. In this case, the Chinese government has ownership in COSCO. 

The FMC is given special oversight over controlled carriers in order to protect U.S. shippers (and competing carriers) from rates, charges, or regulations that are unjust or unreasonable from foreign state manipulation.

4. Japan’s Big 3 Don’t Have Biggest Year with ONE

NYK, MOL, and “K” Line saw revenue declines in their 2018-19 fiscal year with the operating of their jointly owned container carrier called Ocean Network Express or ONE, reported Chris Dupin in an American Shipper article.

Dupin wrote that ONE reported a $586 million loss before going on to detail the financial results NYK, MOL, and “K” Line reported for the fiscal year:

Nippon Yusen Kaisha [NYK] said revenue decreased to 1.83 trillion yen ($16.4 billion at today’s exchange rate) for the year ending March 31, compared to 2.18 trillion yen the prior fiscal year.

Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) had revenue of 1.23 trillion yen in the 2018-19 fiscal year, a decline from 1.65 trillion yen the prior fiscal year. Operating profit was 37.7 billion yen in fiscal 2018-19 compared with 22.7 billion the prior year.

Ordinary profit was also up, 38.6 billion yen in the year ending March 31 compared to 31.45 billion yen the prior year. Profit attributable to the owners of the parent was 26.8 billion yen compared to the loss the prior year of 47.4 billion yen.

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha reported revenue for the year ending March 31 of 837 billion yen ($7.5 billion), a decline from 1.16 trillion yen the prior fiscal year. The company had an operating loss of 24.7 billion yen in the 2018-19 fiscal year compared to an operating profit of 7.2 billion yen the prior year; an ordinary loss of 48.9 billion yen compared to an ordinary profit of 2 billion yen the prior year; and a loss attributable to owners of the parent was 111 billion yen compared to a profit attributable to owners of the parent of 10.4 billion yen the prior year.


All three companies project this to be a better fiscal year with actually lower revenues but higher profits. We’ll find out next year if they’re right.

Click Here for Free Freight Rate Pricing

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Know how to evaluate a freight forwarding company in the USAInternational Shipping Cargo Ship Freight Forwarder